Showing posts with label work. Show all posts
Showing posts with label work. Show all posts

Friday, February 18, 2011

Daily Diary

Worked a whopping 5 hours today...mostly due to a strict deadline looming over my head.

So this is how i did it.


  • Work as much as possible in the morning. Work 1.5 hr right away when you sit on your computer and then take a break and work another 1 hour. Got 2.5 hours of work right away.
  • During the distracting phase.....LUNCH etc....go roam around, hangout with friends and most importantly sleep. If you did 2.5 hrs of work in the morning then you deserve a long break. Sleep is important though. Once you are fresh, then get back to work for at least 1.5 or 2 hours.
4 hours is probably optimum. Beyond that it becomes torture.

Let's see if I follow this up with another 4 hour session. :)

Start work at 9-30 to 11, take break, drink coffee, go back to work and work till at least 1. Come back after the longer break at 3 or later and work again. 

Party time now!!!

Sunday, February 13, 2011

Elizabeth Gilbert on Work

Elizabeth Gilbert

SOME THOUGHTS ON WRITING

Sometimes people ask me for help or suggestions about how to write, or how to get published. Keeping in mind that this is all very ephemeral and personal, I will try to explain here everything that I believe about writing. I hope it is useful. It's all I know.

I believe that – if you are serious about a life of writing, or indeed about any creative form of expression – that you should take on this work like a holy calling. I became a writer the way other people become monks or nuns. I made a vow to writing, very young. I became Bride-of-Writing. I was writing’s most devotional handmaiden. I built my entire life around writing. I didn’t know how else to do this. I didn’t know anyone who had ever become a writer. I had no, as they say, connections. I had no clues. I just began. 

I took a few writing classes when I was at NYU, but, aside from an excellent workshop taught by Helen Schulman, I found that I didn’t really want to be practicing this work in a classroom. I wasn’t convinced that a workshop full of 13 other young writers trying to find their voices was the best place for me to find my voice. So I wrote on my own, as well. I showed my work to friends and family whose opinions I trusted. I was always writing, always showing. After I graduated from NYU, I decided not to pursue an MFA in creative writing. Instead, I created my own post-graduate writing program, which entailed several years spent traveling around the country and world, taking jobs at bars and restaurants and ranches, listening to how people spoke, collecting experiences and writing constantly. My life probably looked disordered to observers (not that anyone was observing it that closely) but my travels were a very deliberate effort to learn as much as I could about life, expressly so that I could write about it. 

Back around the age of 19, I had started sending my short stories out for publication. My goal was to publish something (anything, anywhere) before I died. I collected only massive piles of rejection notes for years. I cannot explain exactly why I had the confidence to be sending off my short stories at the age of 19 to, say, The New Yorker, or why it did not destroy me when I was inevitably rejected. I sort of figured I’d be rejected. But I also thought: “Hey – somebody has to write all those stories: why not me?” I didn’t love being rejected, but my expectations were low and my patience was high. (Again – the goal was to get published before death. And I was young and healthy.) It has never been easy for me to understand why people work so hard to create something beautiful, but then refuse to share it with anyone, for fear of criticism. Wasn’t that the point of the creation – to communicate something to the world? So PUT IT OUT THERE. Send your work off to editors and agents as much as possible, show it to your neighbors, plaster it on the walls of the bus stops – just don’t sit on your work and suffocate it. At least try. And when the powers-that-be send you back your manuscript (and they will), take a deep breath and try again. I often hear people say, “I’m not good enough yet to be published.” That’s quite possible. Probable, even. All I’m saying is: Let someone else decide that. Magazines, editors, agents – they all employ young people making $22,000 a year whose job it is to read through piles of manuscripts and send you back letters telling you that you aren’t good enough yet: LET THEM DO IT. Don’t pre-reject yourself. That’s their job, not yours. Your job is only to write your heart out, and let destiny take care of the rest. 

As for discipline – it’s important, but sort of over-rated. The more important virtue for a writer, I believe, is self-forgiveness. Because your writing will always disappoint you. Your laziness will always disappoint you. You will make vows: “I’m going to write for an hour every day,” and then you won’t do it. You will think: “I suck, I’m such a failure. I’m washed-up.” Continuing to write after that heartache of disappointment doesn’t take only discipline, but also self-forgiveness (which comes from a place of kind and encouraging and motherly love). The other thing to realize is that all writers think they suck. When I was writing “Eat, Pray, Love”, I had just as a strong a mantra of THIS SUCKS ringing through my head as anyone does when they write anything. But I had a clarion moment of truth during the process of that book. One day, when I was agonizing over how utterly bad my writing felt, I realized: “That’s actually not my problem.” The point I realized was this – I never promised the universe that I would write brilliantly; I only promised the universe that I would write. So I put my head down and sweated through it, as per my vows.
I have a friend who’s an Italian filmmaker of great artistic sensibility. After years of struggling to get his films made, he sent an anguished letter to his hero, the brilliant (and perhaps half-insane) German filmmaker Werner Herzog. My friend complained about how difficult it is these days to be an independent filmmaker, how hard it is to find government arts grants, how the audiences have all been ruined by Hollywood and how the world has lost its taste…etc, etc. Herzog wrote back a personal letter to my friend that essentially ran along these lines: “Quit your complaining. It’s not the world’s fault that you wanted to be an artist. It’s not the world’s job to enjoy the films you make, and it’s certainly not the world’s obligation to pay for your dreams. Nobody wants to hear it. Steal a camera if you have to, but stop whining and get back to work.” I repeat those words back to myself whenever I start to feel resentful, entitled, competitive or unappreciated with regard to my writing: “It’s not the world’s fault that you want to be an artist…now get back to work.”  Always, at the end of the day, the important thing is only and always that: Get back to work. This is a path for the courageous and the faithful. You must find another reason to work, other than the desire for success or recognition. It must come from another place. 

Here’s another thing to consider. If you always wanted to write, and now you are A Certain Age, and you never got around to it, and you think it’s too late…do please think again. I watched Julia Glass win the National Book Award for her first novel, “The Three Junes”, which she began writing in her late 30’s. I listened to her give her moving acceptance speech, in which she told how she used to lie awake at night, tormented as she worked on her book, asking herself, “Who do you think you are, trying to write a first novel at your age?” But she wrote it. And as she held up her National Book Award, she said, “This is for all the late-bloomers in the world.” Writing is not like dancing or modeling; it’s not something where – if you missed it by age 19 – you’re finished. It’s never too late. Your writing will only get better as you get older and wiser. If you write something beautiful and important, and the right person somehow discovers it, they will clear room for you on the bookshelves of the world – at any age. At least try.

There are heaps of books out there on How To Get Published. Often people find the information in these books contradictory. My feeling is -- of COURSE the information is contradictory. Because, frankly, nobody knows anything. Nobody can tell you how to succeed at writing (even if they write a book called “How To Succeed At Writing”) because there is no WAY; there are, instead, many ways. Everyone I know who managed to become a writer did it differently – sometimes radically differently. Try all the ways, I guess. Becoming a published writer is sort of like trying to find a cheap apartment in New York City: it’s impossible. And yet…every single day, somebody manages to find a cheap apartment in New York City. I can’t tell you how to do it. I’m still not even entirely sure how I did it. I can only tell you – through my own example – that it can be done. I once found a cheap apartment in Manhattan. And I also became a writer.

In the end, I love this work. I have always loved this work. My suggestion is that you start with the love and then work very hard and try to let go of the results. Cast out your will, and then cut the line. Please try, also, not to go totally freaking insane in the process. Insanity is a very tempting path for artists, but we don’t need any more of that in the world at the moment, so please resist your call to insanity. We need more creation, not more destruction. We need our artists more than ever, and we need them to be stable, steadfast, honorable and brave – they are our soldiers, our hope. If you decide to write, then you must do it, as Balzac said, “like a miner buried under a fallen roof.” Become a knight, a force of diligence and faith. I don’t know how else to do it except that way. As the great poet Jack Gilbert said once to young writer, when she asked him for advice about her own poems: “Do you have the courage to bring forth this work? The treasures that are hidden inside you are hoping you will say YES.”

Good luck.

Thursday, February 10, 2011

H-Index and Notability

What most people in Academics forget is how much luck would play a part in their careers.

Now I am working with "lesser" minds who just want to work really hard to get really bad papers out. They may get published in good journals or conferences but would they ever get citations even comparable to this one.

check the top paper:
http://scholar.google.com.sg/scholar?rlz=1C1VEAA_enSG400SG400&q=Besl+Mckay&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=ws

Over 5000 citations!!!, now suppose you publish a 100 papers in your life...even then your H-Index remains well over 50. Damn, that's the kind of good luck I need to stumble upon. So focus on the bright and brilliant gape holes that need to be filled while in the meantime, do all that is necessary to survive.

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

How to Work, Eat and Shit

Like any other organism, we consume and then we defecate.

Probably the same analogy applies to out thinking as well

Let's compare defecation with the process of working or producing something. Defection takes a small time and the process is intense.

Why not we start working in that fashion.

An interesting article was written by a writer who only had limited free access to public type writers in the library. He was only allowed to use type writers for 30 minutes at a time and had to wait for his next turn. In between the interval, the writer would read and study in the library and plan and think about what he was going to do next.

Maybe that is the way for us to work as well

A researcher's work process could be divided into two

  • Defecation: Coding, Generating Results, Writing Papers
  • Consumption: Reading and Learning new things.

(inspired by Terence Tao)

High intensity time should be used up for producing work.

Low intensity work should be spent on reading.

Monday, January 24, 2011

Animals and Humans in Captivity

Firstly, there is no doubt that work is slavery...on top of that we are unfortunate enough to be employed and hence unable to believe in the veracity of the statement.

I read an article about the ill effects that captivity brings to an animal. The number one problem is that animals don't reproduce in captivity and start following ritualistic behaviors while in captivity and their intelligence degrades.

So What happens if we treat our work and our work place as a place for captive prisoners. We start doing completely ritualistic things such as checking emails etc or browsing the internet.


If animals seek diversity in their environment then so do we.

http://amaurosis-fugax.blogspot.com/2011/01/animals-in-captivity-vs-humans-in.html

Saturday, January 22, 2011

Calvin Newport and Heavy Work Loads

Calvin Newport wrote about how to study if you are studying medicine where the work load is way heavier than any engineering discipline. He writes about the schedule of an A-grade student in medicine who wakes up at 6 in the morning and works two 3-hour stretches every day. Each 3-hour session is broken down into three 50-minute sessions with 10 minute breaks. A long relaxing gap after 3 hours includes lunch and may be a nap. 

Waking up really early might be a key. You need to get rid of your work as early as possible when there is little distraction.



Read Original Article: (LINK)



The Plight of the Pre-Med
Of all Study Hack readers, pre-meds are among the most skeptical. They tell me that although they like my philosophy of doing a small number of things well, this is impossible forthem. Their course load is too demanding. Filling most waking hours with work is unavoidable.
Then there’s Nathan.
Nathan is pre-med at the University of Texas at Austin, where he’s currently tackling the weed out courses that give this major its bad reputation. Here’s what makes Nathan interesting to me: he finishes his work by 5:30 pm every weekday.
In fact, he doesn’t just finish it, hedominates it.
“On the last chemistry test, the average score was a 57,” he told me recently. “I made a 98…My professors are fascinated by me.”
Naturally, I asked him to share a typical day’s schedule:
  • 6:00 to 6:30: Breakfast/Shower
  • 6:30 to 9:30: Study
  • 9:30 to 10:20: Class
  • 10:30 to 11:30: Study
  • 11:30 to 12:30: Lunch
  • 12:30 to 1:30: Class
  • 1:30 to 2:30: Class
  • 2:30 to 5:30: Study
  • 5:30 to 11:00: Chill by meeting girls, explore the rolling hills and lakes of Austin, listen to live music, etc.
Here are two things I noticed about Nathan:
First, he’s not necessarily working less than his peers. His schedule includes 40 hours of studying per week, which is about right for his course load. He simply consolidates this work better.
“But he wakes up at 6,” you might complain, “I could never do that.”
Nathan’s out chasing girls before most students have even started their work for the day. Fair trade, if you ask me.
The second thing I noticed is that he’s obsessive about focus. He doesn’t just “study,” he works on the 7th floor of the engineering library: one of the most isolated spots on campus (see the above image). He works in 50 minutes chunks, and does 10 minutes of calisthenics, right there on the library floor, between every chunk. In three hours of this focused studying, he probably accomplishes more work than most pre-meds do in ten.
I don’t claim that Nathan represents a specific system that all pre-med students should follow. To me, he’s just a nice example of a more fundamental observation: the happiest students are those who take control of their academic experience, molding it to fit their own ideal of a life well-lived.